This matter is now before the Court on Defendant's motion to dismiss the FAC in its entirety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a valid claim for relief. ยง 1367, and the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005 ("CAFA"), 28 U.S.C. The Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Alleging that the infotainment systems are defective, and that Defendant Jaguar Land Rover North America LLC ("Defendant") knowingly concealed this fact from consumers, Plaintiffs' First Amended Class Action Complaint ("FAC" or "Complaint") asserts the following eleven claims: breach of express warranty (Count 1) breach of implied warranty (Count 2) violation of the MagnusonMoss Warranty Act (Count 3) unjust enrichment (Count 4) breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing (Count 5) violation of New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act (Count 6) violation of Florida's Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act (Count 7) violation of Georgia's Fair Business Practices Act (Count 8) violation of Michigan's Consumer Protection Act (Count 9) and violations of New York's Consumer Protection Act (Counts 10 and 11). Plaintiffs Blake George, Joyce Ferfecki, Miguel Ortiz, and Stuart Jolly (collectively, "Plaintiffs") bring this putative class action on behalf of owners and lessees of certain models of Land Rover and Jaguar vehicles equipped with the InControl Touch Pro or InControl Touch Pro Duo Infotainment systems. JAGUAR LAND ROVER NORTH AMERICA LLC, Defendant WILLIAM J. 24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BLAKE GEORGE, JOYCE FERFECKI, MIGUEL ORTIZ, STUART JOLLY, and LASZLO VAS, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Civ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |